By a two to one ratio, the Missouri House voted down an amendment taking money away from bond repayment and putting it into ethanol development.
Paul Matadeen is at the State Capitol with an update.
Supporters say it takes only $10 million per year to repay bonds sold for the Edward Jones Dome.
But the state has $12 million. The state earmarks the other $2 million for preservation.
The amendment would have subtracted the extra money and used it for the Department of Agriculture's ethanol incentive program.
Opponents... like Representative Chuck Purgason... say the amendment would be irresponsible.
The state earmarks the other money for preservation of the arena.
From the State Capitol, I'm Paul Matadeen.
-=UPDATE 2=-
The House rejected an amendment taking money away from bond repayment and applying it to an ethanol incentive program.
Paul Matadeen is at the State Capitol.
The vote was 101 yes And 50 no...in the final vote for an amendment taking away bond-repayment money for the Edward Jones Dome.
And applying it to the Department of Agriculture's ethanol incentive program.
The amendment's sponsor, Rep. Jim Seigfreid says taking away $2 million dollars from the bond repayment would help rural Missourians further ethanol programs.
Rep. Seigfreid says he's surprised rural lawmakers didn't support his amendment.
From the State Capitol, I'm Paul Matadeen.
-=UPDATE 3=-
The House decides bond-repayment money cannot be used to further ethanol use.
Paul Matadeen has more from the State Capitol.
The House voted down an amendment subtracting $ 2 million from funds set aside to repay bond money at the Edward Jones Dome.
The money would have gone to the Department of Agriculture's ethanol incentive program.
Rep. Jim Seigfreid, the amendment's sponsor, says he believes the amendment would have been a fair compromise.
Seigfreid says adding money to the initiative would have increased tax revenue for the state.
From the State Capitol, I'm Paul Matadeen.